Scam dating uk 0704 who is lewis hamilton dating 2016
Did it make business sense for Google to buy a D-Wave machine? Should have acted differently, in my interaction with Mc Geoch?
etc., then repeated the speedup claims as if the more informative comparisons simply didn’t exist.Imagine that someone wrote a blog post bringing all of this to public attention.And now imagine that the response to that blogger was the following: “aha, but isn’t it possible that some clinical trial will show an advantage for the gene therapy—maybe with some other group of patients?This will be my final update on this post (really!!
), since the discussion seems to have reached a point where not much progress is being made, and since I’d like to oblige the commenters who’ve asked me to change the subject.I haven’t yet had time to read their paper or form an opinion about it, but I’d be very interested if others wanted to weigh in.The USC group has put out a new preprint responding to Smolin and Smith, offering additional evidence for quantum behavior in the D-Wave device that they say can’t be explained using Smolin and Smith’s model.Here’s an analogy: imagine that a biotech startup claimed that, by using an expensive and controversial new gene therapy, it could cure patients at a higher rate than with the best available conventional drugs—basing its claim on a single clinical trial.